![]() ![]() However, he never noticed the high morphological similarity between Massylaea and Eobania. Forbes, 1838 belongs to his genus Eobania. Interestingly, he already concluded that Helix constantina E. In the same work, Hesse also investigated Eobania, a generic name he had introduced earlier (1913: 13), and which is based on Helix vermiculata O. In his anatomical work, Hesse (1915) restricted the use of Massylaea to species from east Algeria, but included the Westalgerian Helix soluta Terver, 1839, although he found considerable differences even in the outer morphology of the genital organs. Mousson, 1873, a use that pertains until today. Latest in 1915, Pallary started to use the name Massylaea also for the large and flat helicoid species living in the High Atlas of Morocco southwest of Marrakesch, like for example Helix rerayana Hesse (1911: 104) cites Pallary, who suggested to place Helix bailloni Kobelt, 1888 [from between Tiut und Mograr (= SW Algeria close to the Moroccan border) also under Massylaea and adds that this species was also found close to Constantine, the latter being a confusion with the true M. #NORD MICROSYNTH HOW TO#This statement illustrates the uncertainty of how to define the genus, and which species to allocate there. punica could also be considered as an aberrant form of Alabastrina Kobelt, 1904. However, he also indicated (1904: 100) that particularly H. Kobelt (1904: 34, etc.) in his biogeographical analysis used this new name for these two species, but erroneously related them with species from the Greek helicoid genus Codringtonia Kobelt, 1898 because of a superficially similar shell morphology. ![]() Later, Möllendorff (1898) established the genus Massylaea including the species Helix massylaea Morelet, 1851 and Helix punica Morelet, 1851 in this new group. ![]() Kobelt (1887) listed his findings of Massylaea in Algeria under the generalised genus Helix as was the use in these times. On the long run, the establishment of a modern checklist for the area summarising and implementing the results of the latest research is planned. ![]() Consequently, a combination of freshly collected specimens and a reworking of historical collections were chosen to approach this goal. It is the aim of the senior author of this paper to re-activate the malacological research in the area. Additional information was then supplied by Péchaud (1880), while the activities of Paul Pallary, who dominated the research on Northafrican molluscs after the death of Bourguignat in 1892 focused mainly on north-west Algeria and Morocco. After the main active period in the second half of the 19 th century, which culminated in the monumental work of Bourguignat (1863-1864) on Algeria as a whole, and the very detailed list for the Kabylie published by Letournex (1870). The north-eastern part of Algeria, which is called “La Grand Kabylie”, is an area seldom in the focus of malacological research. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |